PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ORGANIZING THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS FOR ACADEMICALLY GIFTED STUDENTS

Article Sidebar

PDF (Uzbek (Latin))
Published: 2023-12-05
DOI: https://doi.org/10.66073/researchfocus.v2i11.624
Keywords:
academically gifted students, educational process, psychological foundations, individualized instruction, differentiated curriculum, social-emotional support, cognitive development, motivation, well-being

Main Article Content

Xodjaeva Dilnovoz Djumoevna
O’zMu psixologiya kafedrasi tayanch doktoranti

Abstract

The article examines the psychological foundations of organizing the educational process for academically gifted students. Recognizing the specific needs and characteristics of academically gifted individuals, this study aims to provide insight into effective educational strategies and measures directed at supporting their development. Drawing on psychological theories and research, the article emphasizes the importance of individualized instruction, a differentiated curriculum and socio-emotional support. It stresses the need for teachers to understand the cognitive, motivational and socio-emotional aspects of academically gifted students and to create an optimal learning environment that fosters their intellectual growth and well-being. The results of this study contribute to the ongoing efforts to identify and develop the potential of academically gifted students.

Article Details

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 11 (2023): Research Focus International Scientific Journal. Volume 2, Issue 11 (2023)

Section

10.00.00 – Philological Sciences
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

PSYCHOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS OF ORGANIZING THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS FOR ACADEMICALLY GIFTED STUDENTS. (2023). Research Focus International Scientific Journal, 2(11), 162-168. https://doi.org/10.66073/researchfocus.v2i11.624

References

Geake, J. G., & Gross, M. U. (2008). Teachers' negative affect toward academically gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52(3), 217-231.

Gubbins, E. J., Housand, B., Oliver, M., Schader, R., & De Wet, C. (2007). The John Hopkins Talent Search: Evaluation of a long-term research project on development of academic talent. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(2), 119-137.

Rogers, K. B. (2007). Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: A synthesis of the research on educational practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51(4), 382-396.

Spicker, H. H., Southern, W. T., & Davis, B. I. (1987). The rural gifted child. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31(4), 155-157.

Renzulli, J. S. (2002). Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st century: A four-part theoretical approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46(1), 35-44.

Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3-54.

Simonton, D. K. (2009). Talent and genius: The Fuzziness of the nature–nurture relationship, and why it matters to research on expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(5), 587-591.