INTEGRATION TECHNOLOGY OF METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES INTO DIGITAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS FOR TEACHING PROFESSIONAL ENGLISH TO LOGISTICS STUDENTS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the theoretical and practical foundations of integrating metacognitive strategies into a digital learning environment for teaching Professional English to logistics students. In the context of international academic mobility and digital transformation, logistics specialists require not only linguistic knowledge but also strategic thinking, reflective analysis, and self-regulated learning skills. The research analyzes the theoretical basis of metacognitive approaches, the concept of self-regulated learning, digital pedagogy principles, and the features of professional discourse through an integrative perspective. Experimental results indicate that systematic implementation of metacognitive strategies in a digital environment significantly enhances logistics students’ professional English communicative competence.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911.
Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70.
Cho, M. O., & Jung, J. H. (2014). The effect of metacognitive strategy instruction on English learning performance. Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 32–42.
Haynie, A., & Shepherd, D. (2009). Self-regulated learning in professional communication: Implications for higher education. Journal of Education and Learning, 3(2), 87–95.
Fritch, J. (2012). Digital tools for reflective learning in language education. Language Learning & Technology, 16(3), 42–58.
Flavell, J. H., & Wellman, H. M. (1977). Metamemory. In R. V. Kail & J. W. Hagen (Eds.), Perspectives on the development of memory and cognition (pp. 3–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475.
Isroilova, D. M. (2020). Intercultural and metacognitive approaches in teaching professional English. Namangan: Namangan State University Press.
Begimkulov, U. S. (2019). Self-regulated learning in professional language education: Theory and practice. Tashkent: Uzbekistan Science Academy.
Inoyatov, U. I. (2018). Digital pedagogical tools in higher education: Improving professional English learning. Tashkent: Teacher’s Education Journal, 12(3), 45–59.
Sharipov, S. S. (2021). Integrating metacognitive strategies into language learning in professional education. International Journal of Education and Development, 8(2), 102–117.
Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. London: Routledge.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kovalchuk, V. P. (2017). Digital learning environments and self-regulated learning in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 22(4), 1451–1467.