CHOICE OF DRAINAGE LIGATURE IN THE TREATMENT OF COMPLEX FORMS OF ACUTE PARAPROCTITIS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Anal abscess is the most popular case in urgent coloproctology. The problem of
anal fistula formation remains open. Primary fistulotomy for anal abscess reduces the incidence of
fistulas, however, this method of treatment affects the muscle fibers of the obturator apparatus of
the rectum and lead to anal incontinence. The role of a loose set-on in the treatment of fistulas is
widely known and well-studied, which cannot be said about the use of this method in the treatment
of anal abscess.
Aim of the study. To research the effectiveness of a loose seton in a two-stage treatment
with paraproctitis.
Materials and methods. This retrospective study included 60 patients with acute
ischiorectal abscess. The patients were divided into 2 groups, 30 persons each. At the first stage of
treatment, patients of group A underwent incision and drainage of the abscess, patients from group
B, incision and drainage of the abscess was supplemented with a drainage ligature passing through
the affected crypt. At the second stage, 22 patients from group A and 30 patients from group B
underwent a combined LIFT operation with laser destruction of the fistulous tract. Before the
second stage of treatment, patients of both groups underwent transrectal ultrasound in order to
exclude the presence of leaks and cavities. The function of anal sphincter was assessed using
sphincterometry and a Wexner scale questionnaire before and after the second stage of treatment.
Results. The average follow-up period for the patients after the second stage of treatment
was 18.3 months. in group A and 16 months in group B. The recurrence in group A were registered
in 5 out of 22 people (22.7%), in the group of patients with a loose set-on – in 3 out of 30 persons
(10%). Dysfunctions of anal sphincter after the first and second stages of surgical treatment were
not registered in any of the groups.
Conclusions. The use of loose set-on in two-stage treatment of paraproctitis allows to
confidently control draining of abscess, form a consolidated fistulous tract without spurs and leaks,
prepare the patient for the second stage of surgical treatment and reduce the recurrence rate after
minimally invasive treatment of rectal fistulas without loss of anal sphincter function.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Акопян А.С., Экскюзан Г.Э., Манукян Э.В., Курбанян A.Л., Багдасарян Т.Т., Агамалян
С.С. Улучшение результатов лечения больных острым парапроктитом. Проблемы
колопроктологии. 2002;(7):24–28. Режим доступа: https://
www.proctolog.ru/articles/articles_01_46.htm.
Williams G., Williams A., Tozer P., Phillips R., Ahmad A., Jayne D., Maxwell-Armstrong C.
The treatment of anal fistula: second ACPGBI Position Statement – 2018. Colorectal Dis.
;20(S3):531
Vogel J.D., Johnson E.K., Morris A.M., Paquette I.M., Saclarides T.J., Feingold D.L., Steele
S.R. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Anorectal Abscess, Fistula-in-Ano, and
Rectovaginal Fistula. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(12):1117–1133. https://doi.org/10.1097/
DCR.0000000000000733.
Yano T., Asano M., Matsuda Y., Kawakami K., Nakai K., Nonaka M. Prognostic factors for
recurrence following the initial drainage of an anorectal abscess. Int J Colorectal Dis.
;(25):1495–1498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-1011-9.
Seow-En I., Ngu J. Routine operative swab cultures and post- operative antibiotic use for
uncomplicated perianal abscesses are unnecessary. ANZ J Surg. 2014;87(5):356–359.
https://doi. org/10.1111/ans.12936.
Shelygin YU.A., Abdulganieva D.I., Alekseenko S.A., Achkasov E.E., Achkasov S.I.,
Bagnenko S.F. et al. Coloproctology: clinical guidelines. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2015. 528
р. (In. Russ.) Available at: https://gastroscan.ru/ literature/authors/9495.
Шелыгин Ю.А., Абдулганиева Д.И., Алексеенко С.А., Ачкасов Е.Е., Ачкасов С.И.,
Багненко С.Ф. и др. Колопроктология: клинические рекомендации. М.: ГЭОТАР- Медиа;
528 с. Режим доступа: https://gastroscan.ru/ literature/authors/9495.
Pinnel R., Croizer M., Giles S.M. The occasional anorectal abscess. Can J Rural Med.
;26(1):31–34. Available at: https://cjrm.ca/article.asp?issn=1203-7796;year=2021;volume
=26;issue=1;spage=31;epage=34;aulast=Pinnell.
Alabbad J., Raheem A.F., Alkhalifa F., Hassan Y., Al-Banoun A., Alfouzan W. Retrospective
clinical and microbiologic analysis of patients with anorectal abscess. Surg Infect (Larchmt).
;20(1):31–34. https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2018.144.
Sainio P. Fistula-in-ano in a defined population. Incidence and epidemiological aspects. Ann
Chir Gynaecol. 1984;73(4):219–224. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6508203.
Akopyan A.S., Ehkskyuzan G.Eh., Manukyan Eh.V., Kurbanyan A.L., Bagdasaryan T.T.,
Agamalyan S.S. Improvement of the results of treatment of patients with acute paraproctitis.
Problemy koloproktologii = Problems of Coloproctology. 2002;(7):24–28. (In. Russ.)
Available at: https://www.proctolog.ru/articles/articles_01_46.htm.
Шеркулов К.У., Рустамов И.М., Усмонкулов М.К. РЕЗУЛЬТАТЫ ЛЕЧЕНИЯ БОЛЬНЫХ
ОСТРЫМ ГАНГРЕНОЗНО НЕКРОТИЧЕСКИМ ПАРАПРОКТИТОМ //Research Focus.
– 2023. – Т. 2. – №. 1. – С. 483-486.
I.M. Rustamov, J.A. Karabayev. MODERN APPROACH TO THE TREATMENT OFRESEARCH FOCUS | VOLUME 3 | ISSUE 10 | 2024
ISSN: 2181-3833 ResearchBip (12.32) | Google Scholar | Index Copernicus (ICV69.78)
Research Focus International Scientific Journal, Uzbekistan 144 https://refocus.uz/
PATIENTS WITH ACUTE GANGRENOUS-NECROTIC PARAPROCTITIS //Research
Focus. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. 1. – С. 469-472.
РУСТАМОВ М. И. и др. Современная тактика лечения острого парапроктита //Журнал
биомедицины и практики. – 2022. – Т. 7. – №. 2.
Rustamov M.I., Rustamov I.M., Shodmonov A.A. Optimising surgical management of patients
with acute paraproctitis //Frontline Medical Sciences and Pharmaceutical Journal. – 2022. – Т.
– №. 02. – С. 36-42.
Кан С. А., Рустамов И. М., Шербекова Ф. У. Хирургическая тактика у больных с
послеоперационной недостаточностью анального сфинктера //Молодежь и медицинская
наука в XXI веке. – 2017. – С. 361-362.
Рустамов М.И, Давлатов С.С, Сайдуллаев З.Я, & Рустамов И.М. Хирургическое лечение
больных гангреной фурнье //Журнал гепато-гастроэнтерологических исследований. –
– Т. 1. – №. 2. – С. 69-71.
Рустамов И.М., Кан С.А., Рустамов М.И., Шербеков У.А., Дусияров, М. М. Анализ
результатов хирургического лечения больных гангреной фурнье //Современные
технологии: актуальные вопросы, достижения и инновации. – 2017. – С. 83-86.
Рустамов М. и др. Результаты хирургического лечения больных острым гангренознонекротическим парапроктитом //Журнал гепато-гастроэнтерологических исследований.
– 2020. – Т. 1. – №. 2. – С. 65-68.
Дусияров М.М., Рустамов И.М., Муртазаев Х.Ш., Шербекова Ф.У. Выбор оптимального
метода лечения эпителиалъно-копчикового хода //Молодежь и медицинская наука в XXI
веке. – 2017. – С. 358-358.
Дусияров М.М., Рахматова Л.Т., Рустамов И.М. Результаты хирургического лечения
сложных свищей прямой кишки //Молодежь и медицинская наука в XXI веке. – 2017. –
С. 358-359.
Рустамов М. И., Гафаров Р. Р. Хирургическая тактика в лечении больных с острым
парапроктитом //Тюменский медицинский журнал. – 2011. – №. 2. – С. 17.
Рустамов М. И. и др. Обоснование хирургического метода лечения острого парапроктита
//Национальная ассоциация ученых. – 2016. – №. 1 (17). – С. 9-10.
Isomiddinovich R. M. et al. The analysis of surgical treatment results in patients with Fournier’s
gangrene //European science review. – 2018. – №. 9-10-2. – С. 148-150.
УА Шербеков, МИ Рустамов, КУ Шеркулов, ШУ Байсариев. ДИАГНОСТИКА И
ХИРУРГИЧЕСКОЕ ЛЕЧЕНИЕ ОСТРЫХ ГНОЙНЫХ ПРОКТОЛОГИЧЕСКИХ
ЗАБОЛЕВАНИЙ// Молодежь и медицинская наука в XXI веке. – 2017. – С. 389-390.
Мусин А. И. и др. Острый парапроктит: аспекты этиологии, патогенеза и диагностики
(обзор литературы) //Хирург. – 2019. – №. 3-4. – С. 38-49.