METHODOLOGY FOR DEVELOPING INDEPENDENT LEARNING ACTIVITY IN PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS BASED ON STEAM TECHNOLOGY

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Nov 23, 2024
Keywords:
STEAM education, independent learning, primary education, critical thinking, problem-solving, student engagement, interdisciplinary learning, educational methodology

Main Article Content

Madina Turdiyeva
Master’s student of Namangan State Pedagogical institute

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, and Mathematics) education on independent learning activity among primary school students. Using a mixed-methods approach, 60 students were divided into an experimental group that received STEAM-based instruction and a control group that followed the traditional curriculum. Over an eight-week period, the experimental group engaged in interdisciplinary, hands-on activities designed to foster critical thinking, creativity, and autonomy in learning. Results from pre- and post-assessments revealed that the experimental group showed significant improvements in critical thinking and independent learning behaviors compared to the control group. This study contributes to educational practices by highlighting the benefits and feasibility of integrating STEAM methodologies in primary education.

Article Details

How to Cite
Madina Turdiyeva. (2024). METHODOLOGY FOR DEVELOPING INDEPENDENT LEARNING ACTIVITY IN PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS BASED ON STEAM TECHNOLOGY. Research Focus International Scientific Journal, 3(10), 75–78. Retrieved from https://refocus.uz/index.php/1/article/view/1099
Issue
Vol. 3 No. 10 (2024): Research Focus International Scientific Journal 3 (10)
Section
13.00.00 – Pedagogical sciences
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Bequette, J. W., & Bequette, M. B. (2012). A place for art and design education in the STEM conversation. Art Education, 65(2), 40-47.

Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Random House.

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415.

Gormley, K. (2017). Critical thinking and problem-solving: The STEAM integration in education. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 7(3), 14-23.

Henriksen, D. (2014). Full STEAM ahead: Creativity in excellent STEM teaching practices. The STEAM Journal, 1(2), 15.

Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press.

Kolb, D. A., & Kolb, A. Y. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193-212.

Liao, C. (2016). From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary: An arts-integrated approach to STEAM education. Art Education, 69(6), 44-49.

Moore, T. J., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Advancing STEM education through engineering design. Journal of STEM Education, 15(3), 10-19.