RAQAMLI TA’LIM MUHITIDA BO‘LAJAK CHET TIL O‘QITUVCHILARINING TANQIDIY FIKRLASH MALAKASINI TAKOMILLASHTIRISH: DIAGNOSTIKA, MEZONLAR VA TAJRIBA-SINOV NATIJALARI

Maqola yon paneli

PDF
Nashr qilingan: 2026-06-05
DOI: https://doi.org/10.66073/researchfocus.v5i5.2256
Kalit so‘zlar:
tanqidiy fikrlash, raqamli ta’lim muhiti, CTDF modeli, chet til o‘qituvchisi diagnostika, pedagogik tajriba, AI savodxonligi

Maqolaning asosiy mazmuni

Ismoiljonov Shuxratjon Boymirza o‘g‘li
Pedagogika fanlari nomzodi, dotsent, Namangan davlat chet tillari instituti

Abstrak

Ushbu maqolada raqamli ta’lim muhitida bo‘lajak chet til o‘qituvchilarining tanqidiy fikrlash malakasini takomillashtirish maqsadida o‘tkazilgan keng ko‘lamli tajriba-sinov ishlarining metodologiyasi, natijalari va ilmiy-amaliy xulosalari bayon etiladi. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining 6 ta oliy ta’lim muassasasini qamrab olgan, jami 463 nafar talaba ishtirokidagi kvazi-eksperimental tadqiqotda CTDF (Critical Thinking Development Framework) modeli sinovdan o‘tkazildi. Tadqiqot natijalari tajriba guruhi talabalarining tanqidiy fikrlash malakasi barcha besh mezon bo‘yicha statistik jihatdan ahamiyatli darajada o‘sganligini ko‘rsatdi (p<0,001; Cohen d=1,47–1,68).

Maqola tafsilotlari

Nashr

Jild 5 Nomeri 5 (2026): Research Focus International Scientific Journal. 5-tom, 5-son (2026)

Bo'lim

13.00.00 – Pedagogika fanlari
Creative Commons litsenziyasi

Ushbu asar Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International litsenziyasi asosida litsenziyalangan.

Qanday iqtibos keltirish kerak

RAQAMLI TA’LIM MUHITIDA BO‘LAJAK CHET TIL O‘QITUVCHILARINING TANQIDIY FIKRLASH MALAKASINI TAKOMILLASHTIRISH: DIAGNOSTIKA, MEZONLAR VA TAJRIBA-SINOV NATIJALARI. (2026). Research Focus International Scientific Journal, 5(5), 98-104. https://doi.org/10.66073/researchfocus.v5i5.2256

Adabiyotlar

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. Longmans.

Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction (Delphi Report). American Philosophical Association.

Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2020). The miniature guide to critical thinking concepts and tools (8th ed.). Foundation for Critical Thinking Press.

Halpern, D. F. (2014). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking (5th ed.). Psychology Press.

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–

Long, D. & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Watson, G., & Glaser, E. M. (2012). Watson-Glaser critical thinking appraisal manual. Pearson.

Puentedura, R. R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education. http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.