COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS (CNN), SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE (SVM) AND “RANDOM FOREST” ALGORITHMS IN DETECTING KNITTED FABRIC DEFECTS

Main Article Content

Sherzod Qorabayev
Xusanxon Bobojanov
Jahongir Soloxiddinov
Sherzod Djurayev

Abstract

This study is devoted to a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest algorithms for detecting defects in knitted fabrics. As a result of experiments carried out on a dataset consisting of 5000 images, the CNN model showed an accuracy of 96.8%, SVM 89.3% and Random Forest 91.2%. The study shows that CNN is preferable in situations requiring high accuracy, whereas Random Forest is preferable when computational resources are limited. These results are of practical importance for designing automated quality control systems for the knitwear industry.

Article Details

Section

05.00.00 – Technical sciences

How to Cite

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS (CNN), SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE (SVM) AND “RANDOM FOREST” ALGORITHMS IN DETECTING KNITTED FABRIC DEFECTS. (2025). Research Focus International Scientific Journal, 4(10), 20-25. https://doi.org/10.66073/researchfocus.v4i10.1793

References

A. K. Roy et al., "Global textile market analysis and future perspectives," Textile Progress, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 85-120, 2022. doi: 10.1080/00405167.2022.2059892

B. Zhang and L. Wang, "Quality control challenges in knitting industry," Journal of Industrial Textiles, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 445-467, 2021. doi: 10.1177/1528083720987654

S. Chen et al., "Automated visual inspection in textile manufacturing," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 2345-2354, 2022. doi: 10.1109/TII.2021.3112345

Y. Li and H. Zhang, "Deep learning applications in industrial automation," IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 12345-12356, 2021. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3082345

K. He et al., "Deep residual learning for image recognition," CVPR, pp. 770-778, 2016. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90

M. Togashi et al., "Fabric defect detection using multi-scale CNN," Textile Research Journal, vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 789-801, 2021. doi: 10.1177/0040517520962345

X. Li et al., "A novel CNN architecture for textile defect classification," IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 30, pp. 1234-1245, 2021. doi: 10.1109/TIP.2020.3042345

J. Wang et al., "Machine learning for industrial quality control," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 186, p. 115678, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115678

L. Zhang et al., "SVM-based fabric defect classification," Journal of Textile Institute, vol. 112, no. 5, pp. 789-798, 2021. doi: 10.1080/00405000.2020.1842345

P. Kumar et al., "Color fastness assessment using machine learning," Color Research and Application, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 567-578, 2021. doi: 10.1002/col.22678

R. Kumar et al., "Comparative study of deep learning vs traditional ML," Pattern Recognition, vol. 115, p. 107891, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2021.107891

H. Wang et al., "Challenges in automated fabric inspection," IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 567-578, 2022. doi: 10.1109/TASE.2021.3082345

S. Kim et al., "Complexity analysis of knitted fabric defects," Textile Research Journal, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 45-58, 2022. doi: 10.1177/00405175211045678

M. Johnson et al., "Benchmarking datasets for textile inspection," Data in Brief, vol. 38, p. 107345, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2021.107345

T. Brown et al., "Limitations of single-algorithm approaches," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 2345-2354, 2022. doi: 10.1109/TIE.2021.3082345

"TSD-5000: Textile Surface Defects Dataset," IEEE Dataport, 2022. doi: 10.21227/abc1-2345

K. He et al., "Identity mappings in deep residual networks," ECCV, pp. 630-645, 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46493-0_38

N. Dalal and B. Triggs, "Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection," CVPR, vol. 1, pp. 886-893, 2005. doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2005.177

L. Breiman, "Random forests," Machine Learning, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 5-32, 2001. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324